BEYOND THE SCREEN: THE SUBALTERN LIBRARY OF NARRATIVES IN TAMIL CINEMA

Vanathu Suresh A; R. Subramani; M. Balasubramaniyan

doi:10.29121/ShodhVichar.v2.i2.2026.129

Authors

Vanathu Suresh A. Teaching Faculty, Department of Journalism and Mass Communication, Periyar University, India Author
R. Subramani Professor, Department of Journalism and Mass Communication, Periyar University, India Author
M. Balasubramaniyan Teaching Faculty, Department of Journalism and Mass Communication, Periyar University, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/ShodhVichar.v2.i2.2026.129

Keywords:

Tamil Cinema, Subaltern Literature, Critical Discourse Analysis, Cultural Memory, Marginalized Histories, Audiovisual Archives, Subaltern Studies

Abstract

This study conceptualizes contemporary Tamil cinema as a subaltern library, arguing that films can preserve, organize, and circulate lived experiences, cultural memories, and resistance narratives that are weakly represented in official historical records. Although scholarship has examined Tamil cinema through caste, identity, political resistance, and social justice, less attention has been given to cinema as an alternative knowledge institution that combines representation with audiovisual preservation. Using Fairclough’s three-dimensional Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), complemented by Foucault’s power–knowledge perspective and Spivak’s concept of the subaltern, the study analyses Visaranai (2015), Pariyerum Perumal (2018), Kaala (2018), and Jai Bhim (2021). The findings indicate that the films construct counter-discourses around caste, institutional violence, spatial displacement, and constitutional justice while preserving embodied and cultural dimensions of marginalized experience. The study proposes the subaltern library as an interdisciplinary framework that connects film studies, Subaltern Studies, cultural memory, and archival scholarship, shifting analytical attention from representation alone toward preservation, circulation, and contested knowledge production.

References

Assmann, J. (2011). Cultural Memory and Early Civilization: Writing, Remembrance, and Political Imagination. Cambridge University Press.

Barthes, R. (1977). Image, Music, Text (S. Heath, Trans.). Fontana Press.

Bharatvaraj, S. G. (2026). Contemporary Anti-Caste Cinema: Pa. Ranjith, Dalit Movements, Cultural Assertion and the Politics of Representation in Mainstream Tamil Cinema. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, 49(1), 167–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/00856401.2025.2592504

Bordwell, D., and Thompson, K. (2019). Film art: An Introduction (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Chakrabarty, D. (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton University Press.

Cook, T. (2013). Evidence, Memory, Identity, and Community: Four Shifting Archival Paradigms. Archival Science, 13(2–3), 95–120.

Damodaran, K., and Gorringe, H. (2017). Madurai Formula Films: Caste Pride and Politics in Tamil Cinema. South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal. https://doi.org/10.4000/samaj.4359

Divya, A. (2024). “Why can’t the son of Maadasamy be Karnan?”: Caste, Gender, and the Rise of the Male Subaltern in Tamil Cinema. Quarterly Review of Film and Video, 41(4), 438–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509208.2022.2150504

Erll, A. (2011). Memory in Culture. Palgrave Macmillan.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Longman.

Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). Pantheon Books.

Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977 (C. Gordon, Ed.). Pantheon Books.

Gilliland, A. J. (2014). Conceptualizing Twenty-First-Century Archives. Society of American Archivists.

Gopalkrishnan, S. (2019). Marginalised in the New Wave Tamil Film: Subaltern Aspirations in Three Films by Bala, Kumararaja and Mysskin. Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 11(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.21659/rupkatha.v11n3.03

Guha, R. (1982). Subaltern Studies I: Writings on South Asian History and Society. Oxford University Press.

Hall, S. (1997). Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. Sage.

Ketelaar, E. (2001). Tacit Narratives: The Meanings of Archives. Archival Science, 1(2), 131–141.

Landsberg, A. (2004). Prosthetic Memory: The Transformation of American Remembrance in the Age of Mass Culture. Columbia University Press.

Leonard, D. (2015). Spectacle Spaces: Production of Caste in Recent Tamil Films. South Asian Popular Culture, 13(2), 155–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/14746689.2015.1088499

Nora, P. (1989). Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Mémoire. Representations, 26, 7–24.

Rajapandian, R., Dhanapal, B., and Iyyanar, S. (2021). Representation of Caste and Class in Modern Tamil Films. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 80(3), 915–929. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.12411

Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the Subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the Interpretation of culture (271–313). University of Illinois Press.

Stam, R. (2000). Film Theory: An Introduction. Blackwell.

Swamy, D. P. (2022). Karnan: An Assertion of Dalit Identity. Contemporary Voice of Dalit, 17(2), 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/2455328X221088084

Turner, G. (2019). Film as Social Practice (5th ed.). Routledge.

Valan, A. (2022). Representation of Caste and Identity in Contemporary Tamil Cinema. Media Asia, 49(3), 185–198.

Yengde, S. (2018). Dalit Cinema. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, 41(3), 503–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/00856401.2018.1471848