FEELING COLONIAL: THE JAMES WEBB SPACE TELESCOPE, THE SEARCH FOR EXOPLANETS, AND THE AFFECTIVE EXPERIENCE OF COLONIZATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/ShodhVichar.v2.i3.2026.133Keywords:
Affect Theory, Exigence, Rhetoric of Science, James Webb Space Telescope, ColonizationAbstract
Traditional arguments about exigence have focused on whether a situation in the world creates the urgency and need to act or whether the speaking itself creates the urgency. Numerous critiques have complicated this pairing, including Jenny Edbauer’s work on rhetorical ecologies where affect circulates and can be public. Studying feelings around space colonization pushes toward an even more central role for affect in defining exigence. Exigence can be the main point of most rhetorical acts both towards others and the self. Beyond making a case or identifying with someone, the goal is to create a common feeling of urgency with a common style or set of emotional links (joyful, angry, offended, etc.). This feeling is the base for action and any further justifications that are needed, even as those justifications further drive the feeling.
This essay explores affective elements of space colonization, combining language around the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) and its occasional looks at potentially habitable exoplanets with glimpses of space colonization fiction for the affective elements of colonization presented. While space colonization is not the same thing as earthly colonization of inhabited places, it ultimately runs into many of the same issues of exploitation while asserting a kind of ultimate ethical importance, in this case, the preservation of the human species. The affective power of this purpose combined with the sense of adventure involved make arguments against space colonization difficult and call for an expanded understanding of how colonizing affects even the senses of the colonizers.
References
Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (Rev. & expanded ed.). Verso.
Barker, A. J. (2021). Making and Breaking Settler Space: Five Centuries of Colonization in North America. University of British Columbia Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59962/9780774865425
Battistelli, T. (2012). The Visual Rhetoric of Space: Optimism, Pessimism, and Realism in Astronomical Imagery. Digital Writing and Research Laboratory, University of Texas.
Baxter, S. (2009). Ark. Roc Books.
Bitzer, L. F. (1968). The Rhetorical Situation. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 1(1), 1–14.
Clayton, D. (1999). Islands of Truth: The Imperial Fashioning of Vancouver Island. University of British Columbia Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59962/9780774856256
Deudney, D. (2020). Dark skies: Space Expansionism, Planetary Geopolitics, and the ends of Humanity. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190903343.001.0001
Edbauer, J. (2005). Unframing Models of Public Distribution: From Rhetorical Situation to rhetorical ecologies. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 35(4), 5–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02773940509391320
Enstrom, J. (2021). Opinion: The Troubling Rhetoric of Space Exploration. Undark.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish. Pantheon.
Gillis-Davis, J. (2023). How India’s Findings of Sulfur in Lunar Soil Could Pave the way for future moon bases. PBS NewsHour.
Gunn, J. (2011). On Recording Performance or Speech, the Cry, and the Anxiety of the fix. Liminalities: A Journal of Performance Studies, 7(3), 1–30.
Haidt, J. (2013). The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion. Vintage.
Hardt, M., and Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674038325
Harvey, S. (2023). Orbital. Atlantic Monthly Press.
Kant, I. (1987). Critique of judgment. Hackett Publishing.
Liu, C. (2021a). The Micro-Era (K. Liu, Trans.). In The Wandering Earth (235–272). Tor.
Liu, C. (2021b). The Wandering Earth (K. Liu, Trans.). In The Wandering Earth (1–47). Tor.
Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822383574
McNamee, K. (2022). You can find the Tech Behind the Webb telescope down here on Earth. NPR.
Morton, T. (2019). Being ecological. MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11638.001.0001
National Aeronautics and Space Administration. (2021).
National Aeronautics and Space Administration. (2023). Space colonization.
Ngai, S. (2005). Ugly Feelings. Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674041523
Rhee, G. (2013). Cosmic dawn: The Search for the First Stars and Galaxies. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7813-3
Rubenstein, M. (2022). Astrotopia: The Dangerous Religion of the Corporate Space Race. University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226823171.001.0001
Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. Pantheon Books.
Sedgwick, E. K. (2003). Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity. Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822384786
Stephenson, N. (2015). Seveneves. HarperCollins.
Vatz, R. E. (1973). The Myth of the Rhetorical Situation. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 6(3), 154–161.
Worsham, L. (1998). Going Postal: Pedagogic Violence and the schooling of emotion. JAC, 18(2), 213–245.
Zubrin, R. (2019). The case for Space: How the Revolution in Spaceflight Opens up a Future of Limitless Possibility. Prometheus Books.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Matthew Newcomb (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
